http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/anderson.cooper.360/blog/
"This last procedure can, in a sense, make a woman a virgin again. In many instances, the women who get this surgery need it for medical reasons. But not all. Some women do this as a gift to their husband or significant other."
I just now stumbled upon this slightly old news. I can understand undergoing this surgery for medical problems, but I can't get my head around making yourself a virgin for a husband. If I were a woman (no self-respecting sentence begins with this phrase), and my husband asked me to get vaginal surgery for one brief night of his perverted pleasure, I would seriously question my choice of a man.
Two more questions this could possibly raise:
Virgin Sacrifice: So, with a reconstructed vagina, does it still count? Do you think the God(s) would know? I bet she/he/they wouldn't. In fact, I think the very idea of cherry modification would baffle them/him/her to point of reconsidering his own omniscience.
Technical Virgins: In the minds of the faux-chaste, is this better or worse than the practice of sodomy to preserve virginity?
3 comments:
Hey, if we're talking about virgin sacrifices, some of "the Gods" might be female. God, Kevin, you're so sexist.
I've known women who would drunkenly flaunt their virginity at bars (it's hard to picture this, I know) - it was just as off-putting, yet just as ridiculously effective as the technique of making out with another girlfriend to get male attention. Ultimately a power thing, I guess. Done for men, but not immediately in the way one might expect.
Thankyou Taryn for your input. This was a revision J also mentioned that I meant to make earlier.
I think it's more "putting the stem back in" than recorking.
Post a Comment